[ 5.02.2003 ]
Apocalypse dudes
So get it on, if you're ready for some darkness - which hasn't anything to do with it.
"Anttikristus ja Penttikristus tappeli. Anttikristus voitti."
Antt. 1:1-2
...which translates -well, almost - to english thus:
"Andychrist and Bennychrist fought. Andychrist won."
And. 1:1-2
This is the latest historical discovery and sensation in the research of Christian literature. Fragment cited above is a passage of a modern non-apologetical New Testament apocryphon for the humor challenged; it names the antichrist figures Anttikristus and Penttikristus not too popular in the escatological corpus and resembles in tone a little the speculations of the infernal hiearchies in the 1st Enoch (Ethiopian). Discovered as lately as in early 2003, one is likely to think this short fragment has a tremendous effect on the escatologics world wide. Badly displaced in Helsinki, Finland, has turned out to be another reason for dispute in scientific and religious circles, as a capitol of a relatively free-minded Scandinavian land can not be concidered any too holy. "If this apparently pseudepigraphical work would be restored in whole, it would mean a breakthrough in history of religious nonsense, right now when we've just got through the Dead Sea scrolls...", says dr Reuben Heinz of the Biblical Studies departent of the university of Helsinki, remarkably unrelieved. To questions if there's still more christian gospels to be found, Herr doktor says "It's uncertain if it can be called technically a new gospel at all, save a christian one, and until further documentation comes up, we're at lost why were we bothered in the first place - I wonder what would Jesus do..." Counter-arguments underline the oral origins of the passage and the supposed fact that there's been no underground Christian movement in Scandinavia two thousand years ago. "I doubt there was", says Teemu Mäki-kyrpiö, the president of the Unorthodox Religious Behavior (URB worldwide) of Finland, seemingly uneasy in his wet pants, "there's no marks of jew imigration here in Finland before the eighteenth century." Others have disputed this to be the very proof of passages Christian nature, since it can't be jewish, and no consensus seems to be found around this topic, nor common sense or reason.
Mr EagleOwl [9:29 AM]
[ 4.28.2003 ]
"Yes, but why?"
Please, believe me, I've tried. Both good and bad, if-or-else and all that crap. Almost tried bribing and black mailing and violence. Panic button, too. Not that it didn't help and I was altogether too depressed having too much spare time to write or something, no. It actually helped, no question about it. Not writing blog-entries for this long time helped me a lot in writing other stuff, which made me a great deal happier person. So it proven and all, now why not write about it since it doesn't feel that moronic anymore. Sharing one of those privite jests of yours, the memorable written masturbations between the celluloid sheets bound in leather. That'd be fun, make 'em laugh their pants off, tickle 'em where it hurts and shove all of your frustration and bitterness into them, every inch a humorist with a cause. Thinking of updating this buried alive blog of BVBVBVBV made me surface with one single question: yes, but why?
PS: The citation entitling this entry for free of charge is a working title of a song I heard; it's not very likely to be released by that name and so I'll restrain myself from impressing you further with my connections to people I'm not going to reveal to you. Thank you for not bothering. After all, if you fail to care less for the identity of the person X who wrote the song A
1 under title A
2 you probably won't recognise anyway, that's not my fnord. I mean
fault.
Mr EagleOwl [3:34 AM]
