[ 11.20.2002 ]
BVBVBVBVGRAMMATON
nreljhgtb stghwtehgwtkhwö lkjlkjlkjlkjlkjlkjadgvruyufgr lkjlkjlkjlkueyioft4ro lkjdfar o8ryty öö aroyga ahrefbvbvbvbva fej hfglrgb bvbbvbvbbvbmnvmncjvhhfgmvbjnnmnmnnmnnbnbnbwpirt qwertyqwerty qwertyuio
Just how many variables can you come up with doing permutation of eight variables. Say B V B V B V B V, for example. Let's not make it any easier, as I said the B can be read as V, and V on the other hand can be read as U or O and so we'll have some more variables. Care to count? I wouldn't. I've done it on paper with some wellknown
secret names of God. It was tedious and I couldn't come up with many people who could find that interesting. In matter of fact I got quite impressed f my own idea that actually all the great mathematicians are actually Kabbalists. And all that was resulting from making a catalogue of the permutattions of a four-variable sentence. But BVBVBVBV's more like a binary-code where 1 could be read as 0, who don't actually know if it is one after all.
So even if it looks like an relatively easy anagram, it has some awesome cryptographical attributes. Too bad the actual referent isn't that hard really.
Mr EagleOwl [5:47 AM]
[ 11.19.2002 ]
*What kind of animal are you?*
As you probably guessed, the passage of yesterday was quite manysided nonsense, when one thinks of it philosophically. At the moment I'm trying to think straight the relationship of nominalism and species. No, really, I am, philosophy is such a gay science (has been since the jolly guys of Athens) I have to actually try hard.
Under what category does my squarel fall? Mispelled characters of Geometrical entities with a name ending with "l"? Mispelled geometrical entities? Geometrical entities and relatives of root? If all (or none) of the three categories, how does it do for a characters of nonsense literature like Tigger and friends? Or a character of nonsense literature as a subcategory of characters of fiction? And so on, ever to more general levels. Squarel doesn't make for a proper squirrel by far but does it even have anything like a fellow creature to have nice round hours of right-angle with? Or does it exist like any lone specimen of his/her species. If one can at all constitute any species,
by themselves, being square or not makes no difference in that case... Not that animals wouldn't be ready to act some sodomy for preservation of species. But when it's down to animals it's called amalgamation so it's only natural to the feathery and the furry creatures.
Is wolf a dog, or is dog a wolf? If dog is a sort of wolf (even if they've got nothing much in common but fleas - and the domestic ones are proably spoiled anyhow) isn't a red squirel just a breed of squirrel, and a squirrel a part of larger category. Like "animal". So is a squarel a kind of a doggy, when streching the definitions more than a bit? Yap-yap, bark-bark, butt sniffing and some fun amalgamation between races! No? Biologically this question isn't as interesting as it is philosophically. That comes as no surprise as we're probably used to all the fun philosophical thinking can result to. Like the ideas of Plato, that are probably a specimen of ideas in general. There should probably even be an idea of all the silly philosophical questions, but I can't come up with any...
So I have been thinking nominalism today. Okay and the numeration of the name of the Beast of the Apocalypse too, I admit. But yesterdays news about plymouth nuclear-submarine takeover's still haunting my imagination. So I better get ride of it, and afterwards return to phone catalogue fr any rivals of Martinvs Lvterinvs and William Gates III. So it's a submarine, a nuclear submarine that ought to be better guarded, as these peace activists thought. So they broke in the harbor (which was alarmingly easy when thinking afterwards as none went on) and in to a underwater vehicle they entered, just to launch the damn alarm on purpose so no more dangerous intruders might enter the nuclear sub. When I think it in optimistic way, this is probably the most constructive critical act of non-parliamentarian politics I've heard of this year. No innocent animals got killed, for example. Or those found either guilty (or profitable by human standards). This time nobody got even mugged and teargassed or stoned because of the good guys on the wrong side got overly excited about prescence of each other. Hat's off for these security-concerned agents of peace! Yay! I'm not sure if that's intellectual but at least it wasn't stupid unlike the organising of the security of the submarine. Almost like being proud of human beings, being one. Well, almost.
But just as a nuclear submarine is a subcategory of submarine (which could be literally interpret as the vast category of "those under water"
including the submarine war machinery) is a squarel also an specimen of ...what exactly? And what kind of animal are you?
Mr EagleOwl [5:56 AM]
It's too late for you, my friend, they already moved away from here, the pretty links...
Mr EagleOwl [1:52 AM]
[ 11.18.2002 ]
Squarel
.
(an insane rambling)
Also an analogue of the chicken crossing the street and what some O.T.O. members said about it
At the moment a squarel is being run over by a tram. ...I know, sounds awful. No, it hadn't have to die, I've got nothing against squarels
per se... yes, but this is... I know it's not fair or right but then again I know there's people ...no...
OH SHUT THE FUCK UP childish and sick enough to drive on edgehogs... Well, I know, sorry, didn't meant to yell at you. Why? Now let's... what if we just... Hey, I know, let's stick to that squarel. Okay? Erm... For some reason the tram driver didn't notice it, probably there was some kid rebelling his mother and a toy the bastard threw in a tantrum hit the driver ok? So the cute squarel died, satisfied? It's only a squarel in a narrative, good grief! Where was I? Oh, yes. So a blood-frenzied dog pulls her owner to wrestle with a 16-wheeler in red lights. Yes, it's a same story. And yes, the dog survives. And runs barking at the semi-liquid squarel remains. A teenager yells at the sight, making the dog nervous. The dog bares her teeth at the supposed rivalry over the meal as it understands these things unlike the horrified teenager who has watched too much National Geographic and the like documentaries. So what happens next? A firefighter grabs the teenager as the dog jumps and public opinion turns against the probably rabiant stray dog. The oppressing human agent of the story offers the dog boot... Okay, the poor bugger feets off the scene, satisfied? She might even flee the public opinion with the squarel remains in her teeth, as the firefighter slips on his one feet and falls prone with the teenager in his arms. ...no... I did not! No I wasn't! I sware I wasn't about to tell you the teenagers teeth meet violently the pavement. ...well okay it crossed my mind but I ...
PLEASE BE QUIET someone is trying very hard to tell a story here... yes well, I think one could do that, too. No. Oh no I won't! So the dog runs to the park and yum-yum-munch-munches the unnecesarily grotesque pieces of fur and bloody pulp that once was a really cute squarel. More or less. A
sciurus vulgaris cubicularius with no extraordinary scientific ambitions we'd be aware of. Anyhow the golden retriever doesn't take her meal back to her former owner who is at the moment luckily unconscious and badly mangled waiting for an ambulance. Any one of these days the police will teach the dog to abide public opinion. Meanwhile the reporters are asking silliest questions the youthful teenager who is about to disappoint the firefighter who's got a little too wild imagination... you get the picture. Now as the steamy part is about to
WHAT YOU MEAN YOU DON'T GET THE PICTURE?! Uh, well... like, uhm... how the girl would kiss him passionately and.. you get the picture now, don't you. Weeeeell something like that yes, that's the exact point, yes. The hose. Now she... takes your... I mean her clo-oh my god you wouldn't... you would? Hic et nunc? I could stop right here and... pronouncetheanimalsofficially... here and now oh wow oh my are you something now you know you are don't you
NO! I don't give a fuck for the poor squarel!
Just bent over and think about Baphomet baby...
Mr EagleOwl [10:37 AM]
